Robot | Path | Permission |
GoogleBot | / | ✔ |
BingBot | / | ✔ |
BaiduSpider | / | ✔ |
YandexBot | / | ✔ |
Title | Artifact Evaluation for Software |
Description | Welcome Welcome Welcome to the information site for the Artifact Evaluation Process! Learn more » Motivation Please see this article . AEC Structure We have writt |
Keywords | N/A |
WebSite | artifact-eval.org |
Host IP | 185.199.109.153 |
Location | - |
Site | Rank |
US$561,307
Last updated: 2023-05-16 05:39:50
artifact-eval.org has Semrush global rank of 18,856,548. artifact-eval.org has an estimated worth of US$ 561,307, based on its estimated Ads revenue. artifact-eval.org receives approximately 64,767 unique visitors each day. Its web server is located in -, with IP address 185.199.109.153. According to SiteAdvisor, artifact-eval.org is safe to visit. |
Purchase/Sale Value | US$561,307 |
Daily Ads Revenue | US$519 |
Monthly Ads Revenue | US$15,544 |
Yearly Ads Revenue | US$186,527 |
Daily Unique Visitors | 4,318 |
Note: All traffic and earnings values are estimates. |
Host | Type | TTL | Data |
artifact-eval.org. | A | 1800 | IP: 185.199.109.153 |
artifact-eval.org. | A | 1800 | IP: 185.199.108.153 |
artifact-eval.org. | A | 1800 | IP: 185.199.110.153 |
artifact-eval.org. | A | 1800 | IP: 185.199.111.153 |
artifact-eval.org. | NS | 10800 | NS Record: ns-178-b.gandi.net. |
artifact-eval.org. | NS | 10800 | NS Record: ns-214-c.gandi.net. |
artifact-eval.org. | NS | 10800 | NS Record: ns-23-a.gandi.net. |
artifact-eval.org. | MX | 10800 | MX Record: 50 fb.mail.gandi.net. |
artifact-eval.org. | MX | 10800 | MX Record: 10 spool.mail.gandi.net. |
Welcome Welcome to the information site for the Artifact Evaluation Process! Learn more » Motivation Please see this article . AEC Structure We have written guidelines for structuring the AEC. Process See our notes on the review process . See also Camil Demetrescu’s step-by-step notes on conducting artifact evaluation using HotCRP . Packaging Guidelines We have written guidelines for artifacts . Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don’t you? Prior AECs ESEC/FSE 2011 ECOOP 2013 OOPSLA 2013 ESEC/FSE 2013 SAS 2013 PLDI 2014 ISSTA 2014 HSCC 2014 ECOOP 2014 OOPSLA 2014 VISSOFT 2015 See Also Matthias Hauswirth’s site . Image © Shriram |
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: GitHub.com Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Last-Modified: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:43:12 GMT Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * ETag: "6015d2f0-c96" expires: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:33:28 GMT Cache-Control: max-age=600 x-proxy-cache: MISS X-GitHub-Request-Id: CE12:1A2F:173B03F:18326C6:61E7E6A0 Content-Length: 3222 Accept-Ranges: bytes Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:23:28 GMT Via: 1.1 varnish Age: 0 Connection: keep-alive X-Served-By: cache-hel1410022-HEL X-Cache: MISS X-Cache-Hits: 0 X-Timer: S1642587808.102517,VS0,VE113 Vary: Accept-Encoding X-Fastly-Request-ID: 3b1ed80975cfb16e98b5389252b286bec2e021ea |
WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS |